Cutting Edge Newsletter™ May 2008

Public Policy

Future Watch
by John Satagaj, email@jsatlaw.com

In the past month we witnessed a couple of congressional activities that are most likely previews of what we can expect next year. The first action took place in the Senate and involved equal pay law.

Under Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964, in order to file suit against an employer, an employee must first submit a claim to the EEOC within 180 days after the alleged discrimination occurs. On May 29, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a major ruling on pay discrimination when it issued its decision in the case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. In its 5-4 decision, the Court ruled against the plaintiff, Lilly Ledbetter, stating that she did not prove her employer intentionally discriminated against her during the 180 days preceding her complaint.

The plaintiff had alleged she was the victim of a discriminatory compensation decision made years before the complaint. However, she argued that each subsequent paycheck was, in essence, a new act of compensation discrimination, and therefore a “fresh” 180-day period commenced with each paycheck. The Supreme Court rejected the argument but the dissenters stated that the 180-day statute of limitations for Title VII complaints was far too rigid and that the majority “does not comprehend, or is indifferent to, the insidious way in which women can be victims of pay discrimination.”

Legislation was immediately introduced and the House acted quickly. H.R. 2831, the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007, was passed in July 2007 by the House of Representatives. H.R. 2831 amends Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to clarify that every time a paycheck is issued following a discriminatory pay decision, another “fresh” 180 day EEOC period would commence. The bill also clarifies that the law allows for two years back pay if the plaintiff is successful.

The legislation dropped out of sight until last month. Suddenly, the Senate leadership said they were bringing the bill up for a vote and immediately filed a cloture motion to shut off the expected filibuster of the bill. The Senate voted, and as you know, sixty votes are needed to end a filibuster. The proponents got 57. (The official vote indicates 56 because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) changed his vote to preserve his reconsideration option.)

The troubling aspect of the legislation is what is written between the lines. Can you imagine handing the trial lawyers virtually unlimited opportunities to find potential litigants?

Also, this past month a House Committee has approved a bill giving federal workers four weeks of paid family leave. As we have previously reported, legislation has been introduced that requires employers to give private sector workers up to eight weeks of paid family leave. Senators Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and Ted Stevens (R-AK) introduced S. 1681, the Family Leave Insurance Act. This bill seeks to provide up to eight weeks of paid leave to care for a newborn or recently adopted child; to care for a child, spouse or parent with a serious illness; or to care for their own serious illness.

Under this bill, employers would pay leave benefits through their regular payroll and be reimbursed by the Family Leave Insurance Fund, created by this legislation. Employees and employers would both be required to pay a premium into the fund, roughly 0.2 percent of the employee’s earnings. The benefits would be tiered based on the employee’s earned wages.

Participation in this program is mandatory for businesses with over 50 employees. Those businesses with less than 50 employees may choose to opt into the program at a 50 percent discount (only pay 0.1 percent premiums).

I am sure we will see the equal pay legislation, the paid family leave, the union authorization legislation that was filibustered last year and a half dozen other employment related bills in the next Congress, regardless of who is President.

As we discussed at the recent Woodworking Industry Conference (WIC), we already know some of the issues that will be on our priority list next February in Washington. In the past, we have had a proactive agenda, but in 2009 we might be on the defensive for at least part of the time.

P.S. This past month Congress did pass legislation prohibiting employers from discriminating on the basis of genetic information. Genetic information means information about such individual’s genetic tests, the genetic tests of family members of such individual, and the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual. The term genetic test means an analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or metabolites that detects genotypes, mutations, or chromosomal changes.

While at WIC, I asked the group whether anybody uses genetic information now. It will not surprise you to learn no one raised their hand so I do not expect it to have much impact.


International Business Development

Wood Products Trade Update
by Harold Zassenhaus, Zassenhaus Export Management Group, zemg@erols.com


Wood Furniture Imports Slip
Probably to the surprise of few, wood furniture imports retreated from its all time high of $16.4 billion in 2006 to $15.7 billion in 2007, a decrease of 4 percent. I estimate the total U.S. wood furniture market at around $23 billion at best, around 68 percent of which is met by imports. The estimate is based on the U.S. Department of Commerce 2006 domestic shipments estimate of $8.6 billion, adjusted for a 10 percent decrease in 2007 plus 2007 imports.

The ranking of country suppliers has not materially changed over the past year and the trends noted in prior articles continue. In brief:

  • China continues as the dominant supplier, as the U.S. imported almost $7.6 billion of wooden furniture or 48 percent from China. Even though imports decreased, they decreased at a lower rate than the total and by 2009 China will probably account for the majority of imported furniture. This is despite the troubles China is facing including: higher labor wages; higher health and pension costs; reduced Chinese government incentives to produce and export; buyer and supplier decisions to diversify supply and; its appreciating currency vs. the U.S. dollar. More on this last point in the sidebar to this column.
  • Vietnam continues to make bedroom suites for the U.S. market and is capturing market share for other wood furniture products as well. Imports from Vietnam increased 34 percent! It shipped $1.1 billion of furniture and has solidified its place as our 3rd largest supplier nation. While bedroom furniture is its forte (thanks to Chinese owners moving production) it is increasingly becoming a player in other furniture products such as parts, seats and cabinets.
  • Supplies are moving East and North --- Europe, that is. East Europe and Scandinavia are taking market share from others as the table below indicates. Of the significant suppliers of wood furniture to the U.S. (i.e., shipping in excess of $20 million) many of the fastest growing are coming from East and Northern Europe. There is little reason for this to change over the next one to two years pointing to decent markets for WMMA members. 

 U.S. Imports of Wood Furniture

Fast Growing Suppliers

Millions of U.S. Dollars

January – December

 

 

 

 

% Change

Country

2005

2006

2007

- 07/06  -

Vietnam                 

664.261

856.2156

1150.086

34.32

France                  

95.14824

112.5276

132.3652

17.63

Germany                 

101.4385

109.199

129.1984

18.31

Poland                  

122.8034

85.97948

117.5858

36.76

Sweden                  

45.54769

31.83405

37.78153

18.68

Lithuania               

25.5746

25.09344

34.29885

36.68

Czech Republic          

28.38001

20.92562

25.31341

20.97

Bulgaria                

23.91031

22.69385

25.07858

10.51

Norway                  

20.77344

20.5647

24.06149

17

  • Canada’s influence continues to fade. Canada continues to be the second largest supplier to the U.S. shipping $2.2 billion in wood furniture. However, it shipped almost $300 million less in 2007 than in 2006 and its share continues to drop --- now at 14 percent.

 

Wood Furniture Exports Grow
U.S. wood furniture producers are becoming increasingly competitive as exports increased at a greater rate than the exchange rate shift. Although more than 50 percent of exports were made to Canada, shipments to Central and South America increased as did exports to some parts of the Middle East.

It is probably too soon to tell whether the increase in exports is a solid trend as petro/energy dollars probably accounted for a decent portion of the shipment increase.

 U.S. Exports of Wood Furniture

January – December

 

Millions of U.S. Dollars

% Change

Description

2005

2006

2007

  07/06

Wooden furniture of a kind used in offices

94.7

105.5

115.6

9.6

Wooden cabinet, for use in the kitchen

62.3

63.6

113.8

78.9

Wooden furniture used in kitchen, excl. cabinet

15.0

20.0

23.1

15.6

Wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom

125.8

128.1

147.9

15.4

Wooden furniture, nesoi

455.2

507.6

565.4

11.4

Furniture parts of wood

117.2

153.3

180.2

17.6

Total

870.2

978.1

   1,146.1

17.2

Source of data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census

 

 

 

 

 

Other Wood Products
Imports of other wood products (excluding logs, engineered wood panels and veneers) faired much worse in 2007 than did wood furniture, no doubt an immediate reaction to the construction slowdown. As the table below indicates imports of wood products other than furniture decreased 17 percent to about $13 billion.

United States Imports of Wood Products

January – December

 

 

Millions of Dollars

% Change

HS

Description

2005

2006

2007

  07/06

various

Wooden Bedroom Furniture

     3,161.8

     3,213.3

     3,070.9

-4.4

various

Wood Frame Upholstered Furniture

     2,478.9

     2,817.1

     2,932.3

4.1

various

Wooden Chairs

     1,106.9

     1,084.4

     1,023.2

-5.7

various

Wooden Kitchen Furniture, excl. Cabinets

       269.1

       294.4

       266.0

-9.7

various

Wooden Office Furniture

       850.2

       967.1

       967.2

0.0

various

Wooden Furniture Parts

       913.7

     1,030.8

     1,106.7

7.4

various

Wooden Kitchen Cabinets

       795.9

       849.7

       827.0

-2.7

various

Wood Chair Parts

       164.2

       154.3

       149.4

-3.1

various

Other Wood Furniture

     5,558.8

     5,805.2

     5,370.9

-7.5

various

Furniture & Parts of Rattan, Cane, Bamboo, etc.

       219.2

       189.8

         11.2

-94.1

various

Wood Furniture for Vehicles

           0.3

           0.6

           1.3

106.3

 

Subtotal, Wood Furniture

   15,518.9

   16,406.7

   15,726.2

-4.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4403

Wood In The Rough, Stripped Or Not Of Sapwood Etc

       347.9

       346.6

       266.0

-23.2

 4407

Wood Sawn Or Chipped Length, Sliced Etc, Over 6mm Thick

     8,989.8

     8,333.8

     6,497.6

-22.0

 4409

Wood, Continuously Shaped (Tongued, Grooved Etc.)

     1,581.0

     1,732.0

     1,341.4

-22.6

 4414

Wooden Frames Paintings, Photographs, Mirrors, Etc

       405.4

       445.3

       439.1

-1.4

 4415

Packings Etc, Wood; Pallets, Collars Etc, Of Wood

       185.1

       167.8

       154.7

-7.8

 4416

Casks, Barrels, Vats, Etc. And Parts, Of Wood

       149.9

       186.7

       215.6

15.5

 4417

Tools/Tool & Broom Bodies Etc Shoe Last/Trees Wood

         55.9

         47.5

         51.4

8.1

 4418

Builders' Joinery And Carpentry Of Wood

     2,681.9

     2,837.9

     2,468.3

-13.0

 4419

Tableware And Kitchenware, Of Wood

       114.7

       125.4

       130.7

4.2

 4420

Wood Marquetry Etc; Jewel Case Etc & Wd Furn. Nesoi

       520.0

       550.6

       571.4

3.8

 4421

Articles Of Wood, Nesoi

     1,292.0

     1,286.3

     1,204.9

-6.3

 

Total, Wood Products Other Than Furniture

   16,323.7

   16,060.0

   13,341.1

-16.9

 

Total, All Wood Products

   31,842.6

   32,466.7

   29,067.3

-10.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census

 

 


Is China’s escalating yuan making a dent on its affect on the U.S. wood products market?
China started to float the yuan in July 2005 under some significant constraints. Nonetheless, since 2005 China’s currency has appreciated some 16 percent against the U.S. dollar (not taking account China's growing price inflation). However, a few more facts to put the appreciation into context:

  • China’s GDP has increased 51 percent through the first quarter 2008;
  • China’s trade surplus with the US has grown by 29 percent over the 2 ¾ year period;
  • China’s foreign exchange reserves have grown by 137 percent (valued in U.S. dollars) since July 2005;
  • China is amassing foreign exchange reserves at a rate of $44 billion a month, NET of foreign/ U.S. asset purchases which have dramatically increased over the period;
  • The U.S. imported $322 billion from China in 2007, up 11 percent year on year;
  • Furniture (whether made of wood or other materials) and their parts totaled $14.5 billion in 2007 and;
  • The U.S. fourth largest import from China is ---- you guessed it --- furniture --- behind computers and peripherals; cell phones and other telephony equipment and; TV’s and monitors;
  • Among all other nations, China ranks:
    • First in shipments of wood furniture to the U.S.;
    • Second in shipments of flooring and mouldings (HS 4409);
    • First in shipments of wood frames (HS 4414);
    • Second in shipments of builders joinery(HS 4418);
    • First in shipments of wood marquetry (HS 4420) and;
    • First in shipments of all other types of wood products (HS 4421)

So, it seems the nominal appreciation of the yuan has not yet appreciably slowed China's economic growth nor brought any balance to U.S.-China trade. Nor the currency appreciation affected its sales of wood products to the U.S. (and probably to third markets as well). It also seems the nominal appreciation of the yuan to date is grossly inadequate.

Moreover, China’s delay in making a meaningful start at a substantial revaluation in real terms means that it ultimately will have to make a much larger adjustment to bring better balance to its trade and payments flows, i.e. to fulfill its obligations under the IMF Articles.

A final note: S.796 (The Fair Currency Act of 2007), referred to as the Bunning-Stabenow-Bayh bill, seeks to address foreign government currency manipulation. Although it has picked up the endorsements of Clinton and Obama it is doubtful this piece of legislation or its House version will go anywhere this year. Free trade is always to be supported and protected. But, when it is not fair, it hurts us all.

Business Development

Sales Forecasting Tools


sales forecasting

Gross Domestic Product: First Quarter 2008
The output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the U.S. increased at an annual rate of 0.6 percent in the first quarter of 2008, according to advanced estimates released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories & Orders – March 2008
New orders for manufactured goods in March, up following two consecutive monthly decreases, increased $5.9 billion or 1.4 percent to $432.3 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau reported today. This followed a 0.9 percent February decrease.

New Residential Construction – March 2008
The U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development jointly announced the following new residential construction statistics for March 2008.

Purchasing Managers Index – April 2008
The April Purchasing Managers Index stands at 48.6, unchanged from last month. The fact that the monthly Index didn’t go any lower is the extent of the good news gleaned from this month’s ISM leading indicator figure.

U.S. Leading Indicator – March 2008
No Sign of Improvement – The U.S. Leading Indicator input is unchanged in that it is negative. The rates-of-change on the chart show that both the 1 / 12 and the 12 / 12 moved further down this month.

IWF News

All Three Buildings at GWCC Open


All three buildings of the Georgia World Congress Center were officially opened after just 42 days of construction following the tornado of March 14. The Distributive Clubs of America (DECA) International Career Development Conference, with over 15,000 attendees, was the first major event to occupy Building A since it reopened on April 21.  

While portions of Building B have been used since the tornado, the International Reading Association 53rd Annual Convention will be the first major event to utilize the meeting rooms as well as Hall B3, the hall which received the most damage from the storm. International Reading Association will be in Halls B2-5 and meeting rooms in Buildings B and C on May 4-8, with an expected attendance of 20,000.

“We are so delighted to be able to announce that all of our facilities are once again open for business,” said Dan Graveline, Executive Director of the Georgia World Congress Center Authority. “Looking at the damage following March 14, we had no idea how long it might take before we could reopen. And here we are a short 42 days later fully operational. It is truly amazing.”

Since the tornado, the GWCC has hosted many events utilizing space as it became available. These events include the International Window Coverings Expo, National Propane Gas Association, Arbonne International and the FIRST Robotics Championship, the AJC International Auto Show and other ballroom and meeting room events.

During the reconstruction, many upgrades have been made throughout Buildings A and B. All of the concourse areas for the two buildings have new, modern ceiling tiles. These tiles are more energy efficient, create better lighting because of their reflectivity and provide better acoustics. Building A will have safety glass that is more energy efficient and is also safer in the case of inclement weather. New fabric wall panels in the concourses will provide better acoustics. The Lower A/B Connector will have new energy efficient lighting. Over 30 escalators will be refurbished or replaced for greater efficiency. The new roofs over Buildings A, B and C Concourses will meet new energy codes which will enhance energy efficiency. New overhead doors have been installed throughout the building.

The following photos will provide an overview of the progress.

before
after
before
after

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Technology & Demonstration Center – A WMMA Community Project


Exciting things are planned for the 2008 IWF Show. The UST&DC Project, an Association and Member collaboration, will demonstrate an innovative “cell integration” approach to the fabrication of wood cabinets. In addition, every effort will be made to keep this a “green” project. Read the April Press Release for complete details by clicking here.

At the U.S. Technology & Demonstration Center, WMMA will host a breakfast for the domestic and international trade press.

Press Breakfast at the U.S. Technology & Demonstration Center


A press breakfast for the domestic and international trade press will be held on Wednesday, August 20, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Aside from the obvious opportunity to showcase the center, this breakfast event also will promote WMMA members who truly have a new product or service, supporting the theme of U.S. technology. Of particular interest would be those products or services involving non-wood applications. WMMA manufacturers need to demonstrate that they are involved in products beyond wood applications.

If your product or service concept is truly new or improved, the WMMA staff will help you build exposure during this unique event.

Please send your new and/or improved product or service concept to Stella Sytnik. The deadline for submitting your documentation to our headquarters is June 30, 2008. A final determination on whether to include your company’s new product or service will be made no later than July 15. Those selected are expected to participate in the breakfast and provide a five-minute overview.

Stay tuned for more updates and developments in this exciting community project.

Association News

A Win-Win Design Solution: Collaboration with university brings design assistance to Tennessee manufacturer and real-world experience to engineering students, by Jill Jusko

Editor’s note; the following article is compliments of Industry Week….


acculogoA small manufacturer's ability to innovate often is constrained by a lack of resources. There's never enough people, time, or capital available to devote to planning for future growth. Instead, efforts are concentrated on addressing the here and now.

Such constraints need not deter innovation, however, as one small Tennessee manufacturer is demonstrating. Accu-Router Inc. manufactures high performance CNC routers for such industries as upholstered furniture, boating, aerospace, automotive and hardwood furniture. The 25-person firm has teamed with the University of Tennessee's Center for Industrial Services and UT-Knoxville's College of Engineering to develop design improvements its customers will embrace.

A feature of Accu-Router's machines is a high-speed spindle that rotates a cutter at speeds of up to 24,000 rpm. At that speed, it generates a lot of wood dust and debris. The company wants to continuously remove the debris from the router for the sake of cleanliness, safety and efficiency.

"In our machine tool world, tweaking productivity improvements is all about finding incremental gains," says Todd Herzog, president of Accu-Router. "In high production, such gains get magnified quickly. Our best approach to meeting global competition is through advanced productivity."

Accu-Router turned to the Center for Industrial Sciences for design improvement assistance; the center found resources at the College of Engineering. Three teams of engineering students were assigned to analyze the router's dust chip collection, router enclosure and tabletop vacuum, and propose design improvements for each. Several trips to the plant ensued.

According to Accu-Router, the proposals excelled. "The senior [mechanical engineering] students have exceeded our expectations with their research and applied effort," Herzog says, noting that the faculty, too, provided invaluable assistance.

In late April, the engineering students were scheduled to deliver final presentations on their projects, which include sharing results from testing and analysis of the production-quality prototypes developed from their proposals. Herzog fully expects the design proposals to translate into real-world improvements that give Accu-Router an additional competitive edge. "These prototypes will be enhanced as needed to reach a marketable set of new product offerings," he says.

The collaboration is a win-win situation for both Accu-Router and the university students. The manufacturer received high-quality engineering design assistance without a huge outlay of money. In addition to funding the prototypes, Herzog said the university's only other request was for the manufacturer to be readily available to answer questions or provide information.

For the students, the senior projects provide real-world experience. "It's important that our seniors have exposure to real engineering problems and learn how to apply the analytical skills they've learned in the classroom before entering the professional environment," said Don Dareing, professor of mechanical engineering. "It's a tremendous benefit for these students to see their design become reality and to work with a manufacturer."

Adds Herzog, "These three design teams have zeroed in on what Accu-Router does best to do it even better." He further stated that the technical collaboration spanned the fall and spring semester. “No less than five new designed components were created to improve upon existing designs, prototyped, tested and evaluated. There are definite practical advantages, and the new designs will be beneficial to our customers.”

WMMA Offers Kudos to Todd Herzog and Accu-Router.

MMA Recognizes Exemplary Manufacturers
Industry leaders honored for contributions to their communities and the manufacturing industry, by Josh Lord, at 517-487-8542 or lord@mma-net.org


Recently the Michigan Manufacturers Association (MMA) recognized several of the state's most outstanding manufacturing leaders and advocates with the 2008 John G. Thodis Michigan Manufacturer of the Year Award. Each year, the award is presented to individuals who have made a significant contribution to their communities through job creation, exceptional support of philanthropic organizations, effective advocacy on behalf of the manufacturing sector and other accomplishments.

A panel of judges representing industry, business development groups, universities, associations and other organizations chose the 2008 awardees.

One of the honored recipients was WMMA’s Past President Peter M. Perez, Carter Products Co., Inc., president, who received the Special Achievement Award for exemplary efforts in manufacturing advocacy.

"MMA is honored to recognize the 2008 Michigan Manufacturer of the Year Award recipients," said John "Mac" MacIlroy, MMA president and CEO. "These outstanding individuals demonstrate the strength of manufacturers' dedication to this state and their commitment to continually improving industry for the betterment of their employees and their greater communities."

The honorees will be presented their awards during a luncheon at MMA's third annual CEO Forum to be held at the Henry Center for Executive Development in Lansing on May 13.

WMMA extends congratulations to Peter Perez and Carter Products!

 

Become a Cutting Edge Contributor – Submit Your WMMA Success Story
What WMMA membership benefits are you taking advantage of?


Help your fellow members learn how to make the most of their membership – send your WMMA membership benefit success story today and your submission will be featured in an upcoming issue of the Cutting Edge. Please send your story to Headquarters at info@wmma.org.